Sir Syed Ahmad Khan's Transformation: The Hindi-Urdu Dispute and the Genesis of Muslim-Oriented Advocacy
Keywords:
Hindi-Urdu controversy, vernacular language, Urdu, Hindi, Muslim Education, Linguistic, Debate, Aligarh Scientific Society, Banaras Institute, language politics, social reform, anti-Urdu movementAbstract
The Hindi-Urdu language controversy of the 1860s in colonial India was a defining moment in the socio-political landscape, particularly for Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, a key figure in the intellectual and political history of the time. This paper explores how the controversy over the vernacular language in the North-Western Provinces significantly influenced Sir Syed’s views and actions, ultimately shaping his advocacy for the progress of Muslims. The paper examines the rise of anti-Urdu sentiment in intellectual circles, including institutions like the Banaras Institute and the Allahabad Institute, and the political ramifications of language choices on the Muslim community. It argues that the rejection of Urdu in favor of Hindi by various factions led Sir Syed to shift his focus towards the advancement of Muslims, marking a pivotal transformation in his ideology. By investigating the intricate linguistic and political dynamics, this paper highlights how the controversy played a crucial role in defining Sir Syed’s later commitment to Muslim education and social welfare, reshaping his legacy as a reformer.
Downloads
References
Bayley, E. C. (1867, September 5). Letter from E. C. Bayley, Esquire, Secretary to the Government of India, to the President and Members of the British Indian Association, North-Western Provinces (No. 4217, pp. 29-32). In J. P. Naik (Ed.), Selections from the Educational Records of the Government of India, Vol. II (pp. 29-32). Delhi: 1963.
Hardy, P. (1972). The Muslims of British India (p. 142). Cambridge University Press.
Hali, A. H. (1994). Hayat-i-Javed (pp. 126-128 & 133-134). Rupa & Co.
King, C. R. (1994). One language, two scripts: The Hindi movement in nineteenth-century North India (p. 128). Oxford University Press.
Khutbat-e-Garcin de Tassy. (1935). Anjuman Taraqqi-i Urdu (pp. 675-676). Aurangabad.
Misra, M. P. (1865). A Trilingual Dictionary Being A Comprehensive Lexicon In English, Urdu And Hindi, Exhibiting The Syllabication, Pronunciation And Etymology Of English Words, With Their Explanation In English, And In Urdu And Hindi In The Roman Characters (p. 4). E. J. Lazarus and Co.
Muir Gazette. (1869, May 7). Published article supporting the adoption of the Nagari script for use in law courts.
Naik, J. P. (Ed.). (1963). Selections from the Educational Records of the Government of India, Vol. II (pp. 21-28). Delhi: Government of India.
North-Western Provinces and Oudh Provincial Committee. (1884). Report: With Evidence Taken Before the Committee, and Memorials Addressed to the Education Commission (p. 327). The Superintendent of Government Printing.
Robinson, F. (1974). Separatism among Indian Muslims: The Politics of the United Provinces’ Muslims, 1860-1923 (pp. 73-74). Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, S. P. (1868, November 27). A letter from Saroda Prosad Sandel to Syed Ahmed Khan. The Aligarh Institute Gazette.
Shan Muhammad. (1978). The Aligarh Movement: Basic Documents, 1864-1898, Volume I (p. xvii). Meenakshi Prakashan.
Singh, R. S. (1869, July 2). The views of Raja Sheoraj Singh of Kashipur, published in The Aligarh Institute Gazette (pp. 330-332).
Fatehpuri, F. (1987). Pakistan Movement and Hindi-Urdu Conflict (pp. 108-109). Sang-e-Meel.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohd Kashif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
