Artificial Intelligence and Feminist Ethics: Evaluating Firdaus’ Moral Choices in Woman at Point Zero Through AI-Driven Moral Judgments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63960/sijmds-2025-2253Keywords:
Feminist ethics, Nawal El Saadawi, Woman at point zero, intersecitoanl justice, artificial intelligence, gendered voilenceAbstract
This study explores the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics and feminist moral theory, examining attentively the narrative of Firdaus, the main character in Nawal El Saadawi’s book Woman at Point Zero. Living through poverty, violence, and patriarchal tyranny, Firdaus kills a pimp who tried to subjugate her in a last act of protest. The paper looks at how artificial intelligence systems based on utilitarianism, deontology, and virtual ethics of care would judge her decision, often missing the background of gendered violence. Feminist perspectives, particularly Carol Gilligan's ethics of care and intersectional justice theories, feminist viewpoints present a quite different moral lens—one that emphasises connections, autonomy, and resistance to systematic injustice. By integrating literary analysis, real-world AI case studies, and feminist critique, the study exposes how often artificial intelligence condemns behaviours like Firdaus' while feminist ethics view them as morally justified. It emphasises how present artificial intelligence systems ignore the reality of oppression and the complexity of human resistance, so they fail. In response, the article offers a fresh, feminist-informed paradigm for AI morality that stresses fairness, context, and compassion. In the end, it demands moral algorithms that honour the voices and hardships of underprivileged groups.
Downloads
References
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016, May 23). Machine bias. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
Bentham, J. (1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1789)
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–15. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Polity Press.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262045610/atlas-of-ai
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
Crowe, M. J. (2000). The ethics of care and relational morality. Journal of Feminist Ethics, 15(2), 25–40.
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012). Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (pp. 214–226). https://doi.org/10.1145/2090236.2090255
El Saadawi, N. (1975). Woman at point zero. Zed Books.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195180992.001.0001
Hynes, M. C. C. L. (2018). AI and feminism: The intersection of technology, gender, and ethics. Feminist Review, 118(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0094-2
Macaulay, F. (2020). Gender and the ethics of care: Feminist perspectives in AI development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39817-3
Müller, V. C. (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. In M. D. Dubber, F. E. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (pp. 105–122). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.6
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/moral-machines-9780199737970
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr Nusrat Jamal Arshad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.